Your comments

Can you also do EV to FCF? I think you can see why EV to Sale and FCF are excellent things to add. Price to Research might be a little bit more specific and advance. BUT that is exactly what OSV caters to. 

Hi Jae! I just wanted to bump this and see if EV/Sales can be added. Highly recommend both though. 

But thank you for your hard work and continued commitment to OSV! Have a great Holiday! God Bless. 

What a great Yeah, this makes total sense. Jae, you have a great scoring system. There some metrics I don't necessarily agree with (like any other great system). For me, the biggest problem I have with the Action Score is the Growth part, GP/Assets in particular. I'm not entirely sure if this metric is the best vetter It knocks off a lot of great stocks that have good Value and Quality scores but because they don't show a good GP/Assets.

Now, here's the hard part: if you leave it up to us, there's also a lot of room for error. lol. Not everyone is Jae Jun who has a lot of experience in investment valuation. Just because I think this isn't good, doesn't mean it actually isn't good. Low P/Es outperforming is great proof of human errors in judgment and prediction. Just because people think this company isn't good and has no viable future doesn't mean that it's true.

But I am looking forward to seeing our own customizable action score. Maybe you can even provide suggested templates or variations!

Adding the PEG in the summary would be nice too. this is probably the single most important metric ever invented. (imo lol)

If anything, Jae, this should be a big plus. The Action Score got a 28% return historically for a reason. I think that this will help add more meat and proof to show how OSV can help value investors time the entries and exits much better. Because, a return like that, will likely mean the Action score figured out when fundamentals were improving well before the price advanced upwards. 

Thank you for your quick reply Jae!

This is an excellent suggestion! I see a lot of stocks that have run up a lot and OSV does indeed catch them before the huge run up. It would be nice it more specifically time period wise, because sometimes a lot of these undervalued stocks have only a few months as a window of opportunity.

Actually, is there a way to make the headers less far apart? Because the headers aren’t abbreviated in the bug window, the numbers are really spaced out 

Excellent, don’t do anything actually then . Lol just what I needed