Your comments

Demand for spreadsheets have been declining so moving this out of the worklog.

Improvements will be released in next version.

It's been a long time coming, we are catching up on valuation models now that we have complete the majority of the features.

When looking at it overall, the growth stocks There are also other stocks that have done very well so there seems to be some selective bias.

Because it's not a linear system, there are some counter intuitive factors which requires a lot of testing.

We don't define a stock with a Pio F score of 4 but a CAGR of 5% is better in growth than a stock with a Pio F score of 8 with 0.3% growth. Since we are trying to eliminate low quality stocks as the first criteria and rank them, it's not as easy as just comparing numbers linearly.

working on some additional fixes to improve this.

Fixed and released in last weeks version.

@Jay

investigating